A Colbert Report Too Far

It is well established that we here at Nat’s TV consider The Daily Show to be some form of wonderful, using an often-cutting parody of newscasters to deliver extremely pointed parodies of current events. One of the key practitioners has been Stephen Colbert, who plays the smug intellectual to a hilarious T.

But now Colbert has graduate to his own series, following The Daily Show four times a week. Judging from the first episode of The Colbert Report, it’s focusing on the parody of the newsmen, ripping apart commentary formats, and leaving the actual current events to The Daily Show. Even the scheduled guests for the week are all press folks, apparently doing their kindly in-on-the-joke-so-they-can’t-really-be-going-after-me appearances.

Problem is, as great as the gag is, spreading it out to two hours per week would seem to be spreading it far too thin. Commenting on events means that there is always fresh things to comment on; commenting solely on the deliverers of the news means one is playing with a limited range, one that renews slowly. One episode a week might be worthwhile (say, Friday at 11, taking the one weekday that The Daily Show doesn’t cover), but it’s hard to see even the talented Mr. Colbert keeping this from getting stale quickly at this rate.


Gilmore Girls tonight invoked one of my favorite place names. The real Chargoggagogmanchauggauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg isn’t the name of a street; it’s the name of a lake in Massachusetts, although in a rush people call it simply “Lake Webster”. (And yes, the name does supposedly mean “you fish on your side, I’ll fish on mine, and nobody’ll fish in the middle.”)

About these ads
Published in: on October 18, 2005 at 11:43 pm  Comments (2)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://natstv.wordpress.com/2005/10/18/a-colbert-report-too-far/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

2 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. An article by Beth Gillin on The Colbert Report in today’s Philly Inquirer contains this paragraph:

    Colbert’s creation—an insecure newsman cloaked in layers of pomposity—is both ridiculous and endearing. What makes the portrayal so funny is that it rings so true, and the show gives Colbert plenty of room to explore the comic tensions between a blowhard anchor and his gooey soft center.

    I didn’t read the whole article myself, just the part that was on the front page of the Daily Magazine section (and I can’t see the show), but when I came across that paragraph my reaction was “Creation?!” How much of a creation can it be when Ted Knight was doing the same thing long ago as Ted Baxter on Mary Tyler Moore?

    Now I’m sure there are differences in the approach and I would guess that this new show is probably a lot more subtle with the on-air personality stuff and the type of “reports”, but the way Ms. Gillin describes it it sounds like vintage Baxter to me.

    …Just an off-the-cuff observation based solely on Ms. Gillin’s blurb of a description, so I’m sure it’s not fair on my part. Oh well.

  2. I should clarify that The Colbert Report does indeed have current event content – it’s just that it’s silly coverage of trivia, rather than the laser-honed political commentary of The Daily Show.

    Ted Baxter was hardly the first humorously overstatd fictional news anchor, although he certainly made the role his own.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: