How many reviews of Shark will have "jumping" in the title, I wonder?

What’s good about the new series Shark:

  • James Woods playing a snarky defense attorney turned snarky prosecution attorney.

What’s weak about Shark:

  • That there is little in it but attorneys being snarky to other attorneys.
  • That the writers don’t seem to have heard of subtlety or implicitness. This was driven home in two scenes – one in which Woods’s legal team each introduced themselves by practically stating “I’m so-and-so, and my motivation is thus-and-such”. In the other, Woods’s sixteen-year-old daughter sits down and explains to her father step by step her motivation for doing something, in precisely the way that no person (much less a sixteen year old) would do, and ends up after a speech conveying information that could have been handled by two well-crafted sentences, a knowing look, and a trust of the audience. A scene that could have informed us of the character left us simply not believing in the character.

All in all, watchable, but also quite missable.

Advertisements
Published in: on September 22, 2006 at 9:39 am  Leave a Comment  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://natstv.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/how-many-reviews-of-shark-will-have-jumping-in-the-title-i-wonder/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: