…not with a whimper, but with a bleah

I just finished watching the two-part finale of Monk. Now, story ahs never been this series strength; its basically been a framework for giving its talented lead some creative scenes of  discomfort. But this season has been particularly egregious, including teh worst episode of the show’s entire run, the vacuum cleaner episode where almost nothing done made contextual sense; it felt like it was written by a high school student.

But sadly, the finale was not much better. Throughout the series, they’ve used the set-up mystery of this series – the urder of Mrs. Monk – very cheaply, never really advancing it (or seeming to have a plan), but merely using a supposed, generally-unspecified clue regarding her murder from time to time as a trigger to get Monk into a certain situation. The finale does finally address the murder, but by having Monk look at a clue that’d been infront of him all the time, by having the murderer acting now and in the past in ways that make no sense, and generally by making everyone look like an idiot. Everything felt monstrously contrived… and the new emotional relationship established at the end made no bloody sense. (“Here’s someone who is unrelated to you, that you never knew existed, Now have so deep emotional relationship with him that it takes days to get around to asking about the one link you have…”)

A crappy, crappy ending to a show that never lived up to its potential and frequently fell quite short of even what they’d shown they could do. It was worht existing, but it deserved better than this.

Advertisements
Published in: on December 6, 2009 at 10:23 pm  Comments (3)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://natstv.wordpress.com/2009/12/06/not-with-a-whimper-but-with-a-bleah/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

3 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. Heh. Not sure if that entry was written in haste or, given the comments, intentionally written with basic mistakes (“urder” “worht” “that you never knew existed, Now have so deep emotional relationship”) as a satire of/comment on the quality of writing on the show.

    I’ll go with the latter. 🙂

  2. Sadly, no. I’ve gotten to be a very sloppy blogger. Or, as I almost typed, “slopy”.

  3. Know what you mean. I friend I regularly IM with knows when my wife has taken over teh keyboard because the typos go away…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: